Books
In chiropractic school, Dr. Walls-Kaufman developed an interest in the deeper meaning and purpose of human existence, and always felt this secret lay at the heart of motivation, choice, ethics and knowledge. Like John Haidt be felt an innate set of human ethics existed. This is also known as the Theory of Everything. The doctor’s opinion is that the ToE centers on human quality of life, or the quality of life of living things anywhere in the universe – and this would always be the same because of the universal social fundamental advantages of strength in numbers, cooperation over conflict, and then what is the most interesting, rewarding and safe pursuit once any social platform is secured? He has written numerous essays on the ToE, one book, with more to come. He is also the author of two novels and a number of prize-winning short stories. He has written many articles on subjects such as politics, ethics, Tai Chi and joint pain prevention. His articles have appeared in the Washington Post, American Thinker, Flopping Aces. He has NIH certification in human health outcomes research and has participated in research projects.
The Theory of Everything
Article 1:
How Can We be Truly Happy Without Knowing Why We Exist
Ecclesiastes 9:15 “The wisdom of the poor man is despised.”
Here are solutions for experts who have no solutions, but they ignore these solutions because they say I am no expert.
By David Walls-Kaufman, DC
Let’s not waste time and get to the most important answer on why we are here and what makes us tick:
My theory/conclusion is that the result and resistance for everything we do and have ever done is steering us toward our most self-rewarding and efficient behavior: The human race is on its way to figure out that we are, and we are at our best, as a single Genius MachineTM. A genius machine made of many charming sub-tribes whose diversity stimulates genius far more than sameness ever could. All information, data, facts, results and proofs aim at this conclusion, this active mechanism. In fact, the entire phenomenon of information only exists to steer us toward, force us eventually toward, this conclusion, this collective life and journey, that exceeds any other.
Something in us knows—and certainly after you read these words—that we are better off when nothing ever interferes with the Genius MachineTM. I believe this is an actual, crystallized moral dynamic at the heart of our moral and reflex core. That is why we cannot argue against it.
To tease out this meaning further, I would say this: Our reflexive moral core says First, Do No Harm, i.e. harm to none, thriving for all, in order to create the optimal platform for genius (that which pleases and rewards us most), in order that we then encounter the most fulfilling, satisfying, rewarding, productive, safe, holistic, risk-free, resistance-free, fun, joyful—the most interesting life it is possible for us to achieve or even imagine, as an experiential, existential reality. The mechanism is so perfect, so ultra-humane, in what complexity science calls “bounded instability,” in being the centerpoint of all human action and thought, that, in the end, good and evil, healthy and unhealthy, productive and nonproductive, innocence and guilt, sanity and insanity, are always and only determined by what causes interference to our survival, thriving and resulting mutual service to the Genius MachineTM.
This opinion, this theory, I propose, is a synthesis of all philosophies, ideas and history in civilization’s five thousand year climb from its beginning in the Fertile Crescent. I believe this is self-evident, common sense, instinctual, logical and backed up by everything humanity has ever done and learned and reacted to—just as we might predict a Unified Theory, a Theory of Everything, would predict, and what it would be and involve.
This conclusion is inarguable as the center-point of not only everything human, but everything beyond—because, whatever sort of creature you are, ultimately there really is no source of fun, entertainment, understanding, interest or surprise that equals genius, in anything. Not everything we do is genius, but nothing surpasses it, ever. The only thing ever wrong with genius is when it interferes with genius. In fact, existence makes the fact that—no matter or personal opinion on anything—eventually, the only thing wrong with anything is how much it interferes with genius. This is the universal centerpoint of innocence and guilt.
All sciences and humanities point to the Theory of Everything—the center-point around which all of human life, motivation, physiology, law, ethics and reaction hang. This center is a mechanism, an operating system. It is so self-perfect in its humaneness that it is the only thing in the universe that does not evolve. All of existence evolves towards it. It is the reason why life evolves from the platform of the “inanimate world”. This machine, this mechanism, this operating system that life is, seems to make this perfect offer permanently because it is the most perfect, ultra-beautiful thing to do, or that could be done. The ultimate proof of this offer, this operating system, is that it does not move; we cannot even imagine an existence, an offer, better than this one that insists we must holistically respect the rights of everyone who is here. The machination is so beautiful, obvious and deductible that it cannot be argued against, because there is nothing more that mortals can ask—except that they not be mortal; that all the good stuff they want should come at no price, no cost, without effort, without respecting others. However, the effort of getting what we want is intrinsic to the value of genius and how genius works.
For example, health: Yes, you want thriving, but the things you have to do to earn thriving, to make it linear and predictable, are inseparable from what the dual role thriving plays with genius and vice versa. After all, are we really thriving the more our genius and its results are impaired?
And so it is permanently. Forever.
Deviate from the most efficient action of the Genius MachineTM, and, in the linear and predictable fashion of bounded instability, you will encounter stress, physiological, psychological and bodily demise, resistance, discontent, pathology, retaliation, rebellion, even war.
Stress is not only the cause of all disease, it is the only cause of all of our problems. Stress is defined here as any deviation from the optimization of the Genius MachineTM. In the end, stress is a challenge to the way we are supposed to be.
The rest of this website is clarification. I will add footnotes where appropriate. But how appropriate are footnotes, really, to an original idea? I will repeat that I believe the unifying force consolidates all action and thought so that it is self-evidently inarguable. This beauty, simplicity, symmetry and superrational humanity is equifinal and monistic. It is probably the ultimate lesson and realization of Western civilization’s three thousand years.
For more, purchase my forthcoming book “The Genius MachineTM and the Theory of Everything” available sometime after June 1 2025.
Article 2:
Human Life is Linear and Predictable Except for Accident around the Functional Center-point of an Ideal in Thought and Behavior
The ToE must, in a word or formula, give us the cure for cancer. It must answer everything in our lives, or it isn’t the Unified Theory. It must give us the cause and cure for every problem we face. The only exception might be “What is consciousness and how does it work holding the universe together—and how do I manipulate it to get what I want without working for it?” This, I predict, we will never learn. Because the matrix, the operating system of the universe, as said in Article 1, holds forth a perfect humanism that creates or solves all of our problems, except accident. (The cause is stress, the antidote(s) is benefit(s) that offset all stress.) These “benefits” are found in the most powerful methods in holistic health. Science has forged considerable progress and enlightenment on these since the 1700s and the Popular Health Movement of the 1800s. But Pharma and the medical industrial complex has derived so much atrocity profit from standing in the way of progress, and denying progress and evidence—that they have retarded our social thinking. Thus, key elements of holistic solutions still remain largely “hidden” in plain sight. In my opinion, the strongest of these, chiropractic, probably has enough to give science that it alone might be the lone missing piece.
Regrettably, chiropractic stands so far outside our social box that the average reader cannot believe such a thing could be true. Let me condense what chiropractic is for the reader: It is “brain-first healthcare.” It has discovered an uncanny relationship between the structure of our body, particularly the spine, and brain function. Basically, chiropractic’s contribution is that the body works like a musical instrument and it must be precisely tuned in order for us to normally and fully prevent, process and eliminate stress.
The medical industrial complex has stepped on the neck of holistic research most notoriously in the case of chiropractic. Funding, research, legitimacy, growth of public awareness of its findings—all of this has been squashed by Pharma and medical industrial complex influence that has “captured” all centers of healthcare control. Chiropractic has proven itself preliminarily to be so powerful in psychology, addiction, aging, body pain and immunity that it probably is the missing link in the ineffectiveness and costs for healthcare and social welfare that are largely the main reason keeping the Left and Right apart. Most of this research is already out there. It is hard to find, but there. This research, I believe, ties enough loose ends, and so completes the circle, that I say here that human existence is linear and predictable, except for accident, around a principle of delicious, superrational humanism. And so I concede this must remain a work of philosophy rather than science. However, what I see at work is so circular and moral that the “holes,” the missing pieces, must line up, when they are found, with the rest of the Periodic Table. The moral mechanism framing reality is just too exquisite to be standing out here on its own, by accident, with a bunch of shotgun blasts in it. I stand by what I see in all sciences and humanities to validate this point. The final proof is my challenge to all the best minds in the world—find a hole, a conflict, a flaw, in the proposition on the human condition “floating around in space,” as I have described it here, that is entirely activated by the single beautiful choice of First, Do No Harm.
Show me where I am wrong that we already have enough historical and scientific evidence to take a long view and see that reality has already created a perfectly moral circle for us.
Existence, information, data, results, consequences, problems, suffering, pain and all knowledge, are here, and designed, only to help guide us to this realization. You survive, thrive and find your best life experience in the perfect moral circle drawn around raising our brother and sister’s quality of life—in any way that does not itself impede the Genius Machine. Do you really think any scientific evidence will disprove this? On the healthcare, survival, thriving and disease side of this big picture, Pharma and Big Food have blockaded proof and publicizing on a scale that would make a difference. They have given us our medieval fixation on vaccines, for example. (Vaccines, with their neurotoxic aluminum adjuvants and mercury preservatives—that are 10x more neurotoxic together than apart—maybe the most stressful things we do to ourselves. And Suzanne Humprhries provides graphs that show every infectious disease killer of the past had lost 98-99% of its lethality before its vaccine was invented. The loss of lethality was primarily do to dietary improvements, i.e., eating more vegetables.) From where I sit, the holistic piece to make thriving linear and predictable is probably done. The moral piece is certainly done, unless someone can show that, once thriving is secured, genius is not the top of our game. Later, and in my book(s), we will get into more details on thriving.
My fear is that my work on the ToE will be intentionally ignored because I am allegedly not an expert in any of the related sciences, and I have no academic network to promote and protect me, and the ToE cannot be handled without taking on Pharma, Big Food and the predation on the human race by their own elites, including our elites today. My ideas could be poached or re-worded. I have protected myself by trademarking “The Genius Machine”TM. This is the most jolting, memorable, efficient term to describe the centerpoint that I have found. I know of two researchers (chiropractors) who submitted fine letters describing neurological networks who then saw their work plagiarized by editors on the prestigious journals they sent their letters to. Thomas Szasz said the world of scholarship and academics is like a movie Western: He who “quick draws” the concept or language first is the “winner” in academic history. . . . What protects my work is the newness and offbeat concept of chiropractic’s advances into neurology. Health, immunity, wellbeing, pain, aging, costs and prevention will never be made linear and predictable without our grasping how structure is a pillar of stress, benefit and wellbeing.
Numerous writers and thinkers have attacked the ToE. E.O. Wilson mused on it. Einstein and Schrödinger tried and gave up. Howard Bloom produced a tome recently and stated that we humans are creative and that our competition and cooperation arrange around our creativity. Notable theorists like Steven Hawking, Roger Penrose, Peter Woit, Lee Smolin, Marcello Gleiser and Isaiah Berlin say that finding a lynchpin for everything is impossible at least because science cannot reconcile philosophy, science and art let alone make sense of human history and cultural diversity and the laws governing gravity versus cellular physiology. Berlin called this the Ionian Fallacy as his counterpoint to the Ionian Fantasy that was the ancient idea that the function and meaning of life could be distilled down to a single orbit, concept, function or principle.
But it can. At least life can. I believe these great thinkers discouraged the idea of a Unified Theory because they missed the significance of stress being the cause of disease. Stress implies better and worse. Better and worse implies an ideal. If there is an ideal there is only one, as Harrison points out. And I am satisfied that the quantum mystery will remain permanent as the functional “lock” on the exquisite humanity that governs us. Except for accident. Accident is left inevitable if there is free will. And there must be free will since the magical lessons on holistically respecting everyone here, and The System, are not magical unless they are your own, in your own practice of self-improvement. Because stress (defined by deviation from survival, thriving and the Genius Machine) kills from inside out. There is no antidote but not to deviate. (You cannot do anything you want and thrive.) Drugs and medicine are no protection. They are stress, some of the worst. How does more stress cure stress?
This is why medical care is the third leading cause of death, after heart disease and cancer, in the developed world. It is terribly stressful.
All the “inanimate” quantum world is the “dead” platform from which life springs to evolve toward the greatest revelation on being that can possibly be imagined. (I predict protoconsciousness experiments to figure out if the quantum world is actually “alive” will eventually prove true. This would mean that all of existence is “one set” and the biological law of integration would hold true. This means that, in biology, any organ, system or being is ultimately completely integrated inside itself.)
Forgive my lack of deep knowledge in quantum physics. But I don’t think it matters to find the ToE. Nothing in physics is going to change how slavery is wrong and genius is the utmost. Focus on the near rather than the far. Human physiology and psyche are glued to the Genius Machine, whether your tribe is there or not. (Tribes that do not align wholly with the Genius Machine encounter far more mental illness and self-destructive behavior than not—this is evidence of stress.) What if who we are and what we do and think and see is the center of the universe and the entire purpose of creation? If so—how do we get a more exquisite mechanism than with an alignment toward the purest function of our own genius improving our lives and learning more about everything? That morality and fairness cannot be improved upon. Reward is apportioned on that basis. It leaves, really, only the open questions about 1) how and what is the magic cement called consciousness that existence is built with (unless there is another cement?), and 2) what about my personal relationship with the perfect entity that made all this exquisiteness?
Only one outlier remains to mar the ultra-beauty: All the suffering we do that guides us to the rapture. Yes, we must experience the suffering—but it is still horrible. We will get into this later (or in the book.)
What am I missing? I don’t really care if the exact nature, or secret recipe, of the cement of consciousness is withheld from me for my own protection. I see why God had the wisdom to cut me off like that. I don’t trust my politicians either. In fact, I thank God for cutting off greedy sociopath leaders this way. Never let primitives hold the keys to the universe. You’d have to be crazy.
As it is, every fact and law on the books is crafted to push us toward a contract, an obligation, to be better than we are born—to be better than our first instinct. To channel pure thriving into the highest expression of our humanity, and to witness how that amusement park ride takes off like nothing else. However much we fail is exactly how much we stress ourselves and miss out on. This singular obligation is bound into the innate expectations people hold for how we treat them, and what we are supposed to do. The mechanism is already woven into the survival reflexes of every rational victim.
Article 3:
The Mathematical Formula on Our Full Participation in the Genius MachineTM
In five thousand years of civilization this is the only complete ToE I know of, that explains everything, things like accidents, ignorance, good and evil, and gives a mathematical formula to describe the dynamic. Why the world goes round as it does is inarguable, as you will see, because it is so self-evident, beautiful and majestic that it stands as irrefutable. It cannot evolve to a higher level. Physicists preoccupy themselves with the how on the function of life rather than the why, but at the right moment the scientific evidence tips the scale on why the human machine works exactly like a machine because we see its sole purpose, and the how becomes only academically important.
For example, you do not want me to kill you, or take away your health and thriving unless you volunteer to, say, donate a kidney. You may not know why you are here, or you want to stay here, but you have a host of survival reflexes that are designed to keep you here for some reason. That reason is for you to become realized and then to participate 100% in the Genius Machine, and enjoy the ride. Your thriving is to help you enjoy that ride to the utmost.
This is the complete why of existence. The how is how consciousness works, and whatever waves or particles consciousness—or whatever the substrate of the universe is—or the primal command of the Big Bang—that created everything and set it in motion toward this destiny. A destiny more glorious and wonderful for mortals than anything else they could ever conceive. All of this is self-explanatory, self-evident, as, in my opinion, at some point the Unifying Principle should be. It should be visible in plain English even to everyone in the very back row, so that none of us have to rely on the opinions of experts, who, history shows, tend to ball themselves into an elite who then lie to us so that they can gain materially by making less of our lives. Which we already said in Article 1 is against the rules: “No one is here to have their lives made less by the intrigues of others.” That basic point of humanity is the basis of Judeo-Christian ethics since the epiphany at Sinai and the Ten Commandments in 1313 B.C.
Physicists want to know how consciousness does all this. Does it really matter? My prediction is that some fact will continue to move the goalposts the deeper we get into answering how consciousness works (to put a lock on the perfect humanity.) To me, the quantum examination of how consciousness works is like asking how many balls there are in a Newton’s Rocker, and how do they work? Whether there are three balls in a Newton’s Rocker or a million—they all move enough as one to click and swing and keep expressing Balance, a basic law of the universe. Balance is expressed in our ethos to block slavery and cheating people of their potential from ever being Just and fair. Once that right, that lesson, that principle, is learned it is hard to go back from it. Why? Because the idea is seen and felt instinctively to be inefficient for the Genius Machine. It is not the right way to coax the best out of us. If I do not coax the best out of you, I only cheat myself.
You may try to kill, deceive or cheat me because you want more. More of what? Bad people always want more of the same four things—power, money, sex or ego. (The ego of thinking they are entitled to cheat others to improve themselves materially.) God, Nature, Life, Existence, the Big Bang, the Cosmos, the Universe, Creation or Godness even makes this materialist motivation look ridiculous: Really, you’re going to kill, deceive or cheat me so that you get more money, power, sex or ego? We all want more sex, power, money and ego—but as we advance and sophisticate we realize the value of the Genius Machine is so rare and unpredictable that the purity of the event should lie at the heart and soul of all we are, to be honored as the sine qua non of all tribes.
The events of life are pre-destined to help us realize this most wonderful realization there is. Like the Rocker, the human machine works inside the “gravity,” the “orbit,” of what is our best possible life experience. This gravity, orbit, or “node,” is a two-part, binary, Yin-Yang perpetual motion machine: First, comes the simple ideal of survival in optimal thriving; next comes the simple ideal of how best we use all that thriving. Let’s give another example: Why was it wrong for Stalin and Mao to kill 145 million people between them? (I should ask about Hitler and the six million Jews, but why is Hitler always cited when Stalin and Mao butchered so many more?) Was it “wrong”? What makes killing people wrong? What makes it an atrocity or unconscionable? There is only one reason that ties to you directly, to your life, and your life potential. Yes, it’s tragic, a shame, a loss, and a stain on our human record—because God knows how many geniuses and helpers of genius we lost, who could have advanced us and improved us if they had all accepted the efficiency of genius as the moral and productive center of our being.
If they don’t, the more they don’t, the more they are a problem. Like a bad pet. Pets are wonderful. But if you have a pet that tears up the furniture, craps in the house, bites the kids or neighbors, what is happening? Why is the disruption important? What would you rather be doing besides cleaning up and apologizing and paying for what the dog does? If the dog bites enough people it will be put down. Working, playing, improving your life by raising your brother and sister’s quality of life for hire, rather than for free? . . . All data, information, resistance and consequences align to show us our highest humanism. We are to find and maintain our highest level of health to pursue our highest level of humanity in the open-ended event of genius optimally raising our quality of life, learning and entertainment. The more we fail the more we pay a price. This dynamic reciprocity cannot be made any better than it is. Creation is perfect. The systems and structural forces are flawlessly designed to convince you of an inevitable conclusion about your own most fulfilled life that only comes from fully embracing, understanding, accepting, appreciating and living your own realization of your highest humanity. And this does not mean to be a monk, at all, as we will see later. (The outer limits of what is permitted are thoughts and actions that harm you or others—from optimally helping genius.) The parameters, the structural forces, presumably in consciousness, framing stress and benefit cannot be made any more liberal than they are: First, Do No Harm.
This structure of flawless humanism underlying evolution and all of life takes its place in string theory as another interlocking block of perfect fixed reality. Whether we see this law or not all of logic, data, instinct, results, reaction, consequences, risk, resistance, doubt, searching, questions, answers and social dynamics are tied to this rapturous endpoint. (Do we get there now with but a single choice—or do we wait while all the primitives among us ‘catch up’ in 60,000 years?) The following mathematical equation represents well enough how this two-part functional node of thriving and genius captures everything in human scale (and beyond) to introduce us to this optimal way of existing that is unimpeachable because it cannot sustain the tiniest edit:

Here, sigma (σ or Σ) symbolizes how Lamé coefficients and Hooke’s Law describe the modular integrity, auxetic and tensegrous tension, curvelinear progression, elastic deformation, isotropy, monism and the mathematics of elastic structures that actively hold all life systems in place, including morality, tribal dynamics and the innate expectations for a better life in the human psyche. Every biological system and organism shows evolutionary deference to this icon for the sake of an eventual higher holistic self-interest. This modular integrity spans tribalism, law, results, consequences, right and wrong, ethics, psychology, social dynamics, biology, physiology, history, revenge and reward. We know this is true because all tribes define innocence and guilt the same way—by their own survival and improvement. And when everyone is thriving—what comes next? The best way to improve is through our gift of genius. We know this is true because no one is here to be the plaything of anyone else. The more this wrong happens—what occurs? Is there a formula to show the resistance and lack of incentive that arises? Why does this reaction arise innately, and what difference does it make?
This moral set is in our DNA and innate neurological expectations. It is perfect that the set is there. It is perfect that we evolve toward this understanding. It is perfect that the truth is hard to let go of once seen: People have to be bribed or terrorized to stay away from denying it. And what happens the more the rest of us see that our “betters” and our “elites” are engaging in bribery and terror to keep themselves materially advantaged over us—and why does it piss us off?
As you sophisticate and evolve, the right moral choice becomes easier. But God, Nature, Life, Existence, Creation, the Cosmos, the Universe, the Big Bang, or Godness will not make the choice for you. For you would not get the full holistic benefit of the choice if it did.
Article 4:
Translating Math ToE into Common Language
Mathematics is a language of symbols. The equation above captures the elastic, modular integrity of biological organisms and systems and, most importantly, the biological determinism that keeps us on course to find the best way to spend our lives. The biological determinism fixed on the Genius Mahcine will stretch, but if challenged too much, we die. That modular integrity is seen in reverse when, the more someone tries to harm you, you escalate your resistance. Your survival reflexes make you want to be here. Whatever else personally you have going on, the layered stability and security of your world is oriented like a ladder toward the best phenomenon mortals could ever want—the process of genius and what it does. Every level of reality forms the platform for the Goldilocks Zone, that itself forms the platform, the stage, from which life springs and then evolves toward this grand realization: The moral mechanism of this function is First, Do No Harm, and stress and benefit—psychological, physical, chemical, functional or global—is a challenge to this ideal way we are supposed to be: Raising one another’s holistic quality of life by never disrupting anyone’s honest role and earning from this peerless event.
The coincidence would be uncanny—but then how do we explain how this flawless moral core is the only thing in the universe that does not change? If this is the only thing in the universe that does change, it might be important. Maybe our body, mind, chemical, functional and tribal allegiance and resonance with it is, in the end, the most vital factor in a life well-lived?
Only “benefit” counters, cures and prevents all stress. There may be lag times, but there is only this single reality: Harm to none, thriving for all, in order to create the optimal platform for genius, so that we encounter the most satisfying, fulfilled, rewarding, safe, holistic, risk-free, natural, un-artificial, fun, joyful—the most interesting life it is possible for us to imagine, experientially. Only our allegiance to this core in thought and action determines our level of thriving and lifespan. Medical care only matters if we have an accident—then the miracles of trauma care have a place. Otherwise they are lipstick on a pig. And so it is only a matter of time before we realize our highest holistic reward and lowest risk lie only in seeing that we are at our best as one tribe made of many charming sub-tribes whose variety further stimulates genius and creation.
Today, a tribe may still be so primitive and predatory that it sees its greatest well-being coming from decimating and harvesting other tribes. But would that tribe be better off with more or fewer achievements of genius? Bruce Lipton and Candace Pert said that organisms cannot be in defense and growth at the same time. This idea is not wholly true, but it is true enough and makes a strong point. (However, can a scientist or artist who has lost her leg, or is battling cancer, not continue her work if she wants to? She can, and will, as much as she is able, and as much as she has the interest to do so.) Tribes, like individuals, may be so primitive that they do not care if they impede genius. But does that change how they have possibly cut short their own course of discovery that is, so far as we can tell, staggering in its potential reward? Maybe a tribe does not wish to improve its circumstances, or to deny the bird in hand for an abstract future reward. Short-sightedness does not change the tangible offer. It is hard to make an argument to some of us about abstracts and potential rewards. But, again, the difficulty of the argument does not change the fundamental truth of the zoomed-out view. As primitives kill others, they affect strength in numbers, cooperation over conflict, increase risk, and kill off potential geniuses and helpers who might deliver any number of advantages and insights to you—if you would simply accept for yourself less power, money, sex and ego. To do this—to get along with others—you may have to suppress some of your animal urges. The choice is entirely your own. But your tribe will evaluate whether you are helping or hurting. And, again, we are all well versed in this trade-off because we all belong to a tribe—even the most dangerous among us, the tribe of elites.
To repeat, the choice is never made for you because if it was you will never get the full holistic benefit of the choice. The action and thought must be part of your core. Or it’s out of true, out of tune. The action would mean nothing if it was given to you. It’s like God playing with Barbie and Ken dolls. If God makes Barbie and Ken do the thing they must—what is the fun, and meaning, in it? I predict the truth is already written into the science of our physiology and psychology: We must voluntarily fully embrace and understand and live this measurable psycho-moral-biological perfect in order to be wholly in tune with ourselves and to earn maximum benefit.
We know this is true because it is not possible for us to improve upon it or miss it without hurting ourselves or others. We know this is true because we cannot conceive of a truth or source that is fair and safely stimulatory. We know this is true because we know no well-done study will ever prove otherwise; will never take us to a different conclusion of what is best. Any argument to the contrary is only saying Person A may want more power, sex, money and ego by harming others. Yes, they may. Yes, there may be people like that. But the fact that such people exist does not change how the perfect waits permanently for us, all around us, and is accessed fully at any time merely by choice. Choice is the only on-switch on this perfect machine. Any split leads to stress. Any split leaves someone behind unfairly and leads to risk and some sort of progressive psychological, physical, chemical or functional breakdown. In all tribes, members agree to check their wants for the sake of strength in numbers, cooperation over conflict, in order to have the best chance at the best of what comes next.
This cohesion holds true even for the elites that gradually form at the top of any group to run it more efficiently. Even elites subscribe to the self-control of “honor among thieves” as natural tendencies make them begin to believe, after about seventeen years, that they are better than the rest of us. I pick seventeen years because the Heritage Foundation did a study that found both Democrats and Republicans began to believe after that time that their power and money in Washington is the best fix. (But all problems are caused from inside out when we split from this scientific divine. There really isn’t that much anyone can do for us except educate us and show us proof of the biological determinism that follows like a stalker when our thoughts and deeds stray from the ideal.) Sometimes people beneath us may indeed be primitive and subhuman, as proven by the fact of how little they care about others, and justify this by saying ‘the others’ don’t care about them. Guilt is determined by who split from the ideal first, and by how much. The best solution, in order to protect the highest number of potential geniuses and helpers, is to lead with education, realization, comparison and encouragement toward the holistic ideal, rather than deception, exploitation or war or force for any further disruption.
War is only an option when a sub-tribe will not see the reasonableness of not attacking another part of the Genius Machine. One part of the Genius Machine should never attack another part. You don’t know what you’re going to lose out on. You never know when you will cheat yourself of something wonderful.
Deviation from the permanent perfect is the only point. A rich man can hire a better surgeon, but he is still rotting from inside out. Rot = Stress vs Benefit + innate gifts and liabilities of the person. Down where the knife and drug cannot reach. How much we are contributing to holistic progress? People are cheated every day. But this does not change how what they are paid should stem from how much they help genius raise holistic quality of life. And both parties must be fair and reasonable. ‘Fair and reasonable’ are also both determined by what serves genius best. Again—nothing is bad until it detracts genius. The more detraction, the more stress, the more dead space. The healthiest living system, organ or organism has the least dead space.
Living things anywhere in the universe seem to have to evolve through the same stages from primitiveness to realization to see the perfect: Strength in numbers, cooperation over conflict, for the optimal. The word “holistic” then only truly applies to this most comprehensive “tuning.” This holistic choice to live as one tribe converts us all into either potential geniuses or helpers. And genius can be as contagious as it is unpredictable. Should we have three potential geniuses and helpers or seven billion? This question of numbers of people is relevant when we have a strong movement among Leftist intellectuals who believe we currently have six billion too many people on the planet. Their thinking has infected generations since the 1960s. But how many geniuses do we want or should we have? Only the utter unpredictability of genius and its contagiousness gives us all potential, and makes us all matter in the most practical, real way that is, to some extent, beyond emotion, actually relevant to us all. Even the total unpredictability of genius and its seeming endless variety appear to affirm that it alone is the ideal. This is the innate meritocracy that always emerges or evolves in every tribe for the sake of efficiency, less friction, and maximum tribal reward. No tribe, not primitives, not even authoritarian Marxist elites, accept open-ended deadweight among their own. To do so takes on risk and inefficiency. But Leftism will fastrack the torpedoes of addiction and welfare deadweight in any “enemy” tribe, like the United States, that was the greatest bastion against Leftism, in order to take it down with the 1966 Cloward-Piven strategy of ballooning welfare and national debt.
Let’s re-define Left and Right. The “Right” are “conservatives” of America and Western civilization who believe that the ascent of the West has led to the edge of the realization outlined here: “Utopia,” or the best we can do—is the optimization of the Genius Machine, and they agree that the secret to unleashing it probably does not require violence, but realization and choice. The “Left,” or “radicals,” believe the Marxist credo that the world is fundamentally flawed and must be blown up or traumatized in order to change the system into something different than it is. And the irreducible problem is the “Fascists,” who are the tribe Leftists always blame, even other Leftists, as happened when Lenin ordered that all non-Communists be eradicated after these groups helped win the Russian Revolution from 1917 to 1923. Italian Fascists were also Leftists, rising in the 1880s, in that they believed in dramatic social reform, welfare relief, higher taxes, land reform, scientific nationalized medical care. The Left will agree, either now or later, that Utopia is the optimization of the Genius Machine, but they will disagree that ultimately it comes about only with choice: The Left will insist that we can only get to Utopia after their political enemies are wiped out. Then we can reach the perfect.
The system of stress and benefit is as regimented as Mendeleev’s Periodic Table though stress and consequences may show lag times as they travel through different materials, organs, systems and beings. Evil may attack this holistic system and oppress holistic reactions, and evildoers may time-out and die before holistic social, psychological and physiological stresses fully catch up to them in the great stacking up of Good-For-Yous versus Bad-For-Yous that exactly determine lifespan. We see this in the cases of Mao, Stalin and Hitler or even common criminals. How these monsters lived the basics of thriving in diet, vices and habits far outweighed the psychic load of all the innocent people they killed. But, given the law of integration, with the Genius Machine at the heart, do we really think their immorality played no role in their wellbeing? Certainly risk went up. If they had no armies and secret police who believed in Leftist ideals enough to protect them—what would their victims and relatives of their victims have done to them? What happens to productivity of the rest of us who see innocent people taken off in the middle of the night? Growth versus defense.
Two points emerge: First, nature always arranges organisms, organs and systems into spheres that are entirely connected inside themselves although with lag times. Second, this means that any deviation from the ideal must on some level stress any system, organ or individual—meaning YOU in proportion to the stress. (Or else Balance doesn’t work, and integration isn’t true, or there is no moral center in how you react and behave or what you want.) This Law of Stress must be true on some level even if you are a psychopath or your tribe is psychopathic. And all stresses and benefits, as determined by allegiance to the Genius Machine, go into our quantum hopper to determine our life’s fulfillment, whether we like it or not, and whether we know it or not. (Does black mold in a wall, stress or cancer kill you even if you do not know they exist, or why they exist?)
Our level of awareness matter not at all. Our rights end where the rights of others begin, as defined by The Machine. A thing is only evil the more it impedes The Machine. You and I only matter and care because the most beautiful process that could ever be conceived depends on us. The more any of us see this simple, stunning beauty, the more our resistance hardens against any injustice or disturbance against this Tao of improvement, rewards and surprises. Confusion and mistakes are much easier when we don’t know what the meaning of life is. When we are completely ignorant about what stress is and what it comes from we take on a great deal. The more you understand where stress comes from, and that it is only here to make you a better person, you become much more cautious and respectful of its power. Especially when our resistance makes no difference anyway. We cannot hide from it. We cannot outrun it. We cannot escape it with medication. It is here to come for you. It is here to change you. The moment we deviate it starts. All you have to do is be a better person in the most holistic sense that you have no power to change.
The basis of all worth and price and interest begins with genius at the top and slopes down accordingly to the last penny. Genius is the Haley’s Comet of human existence. The results of straying from this center-point are ruthless because they have to be in order for us to learn as quickly as possible how to stop hurting ourselves, and others. This is the life of the highest efficiency, safety, holism, pleasure, interest and self-reward—without us falling down the self-destructive slippery slope of artificially enhanced pleasures in any type of addiction.
This is a miraculous institution. This process is an eventuality because to get our epiphany right away, or to be born with it, or to learn it too easily, would be to make the greatest lesson of existence mean too little, and spoil the thunder clap of realization, and the surprise—and the amazement. To cheapen the lesson would also heighten the odds of fumbling away this stunning fact on the interconnection of all things. We would then all the more keep having to relearn the lesson by repeating the same cruel cycle of bad consequences and risks that are progressively fused to this ideal in biological determinism and tribal law. Biological determinism is fused to thriving. Our thriving is ultimately fused to the highest expression of our own humanity and genius. This ideal is an innate expectation. It may take another sixty thousand years for some of us to get the unbending offer, but our slow pace does not change how our release lies only in this extraordinarily comprehensive humanism at the heart of holistic reward. The astonishing, conclusive power in this single choice of First, Do No Harm is the moral endgame of equifinality and superrationality. It frames the bounded instability of systems theory and complexity science and the observations on spontaneous order and emergent self-order of Driesch, Powers, Bertalanffy and others first discussed as early as 1803.
To fail brings on the stress that is the bane of our existence, psychological, chemical, structural, functional (intra-tribal) or global (inter tribal) stress.
Until that day comes—voluntarily, enthusiastically—the tuning, the pitch, of the human musical instrument falls that much short of what it could be, and we will experience disruption by that much. There has never been a well-done scientific study that does not confirm this holistic design. Stress and risk result to the exact extent that we impede the machine. I say this must be true because how could it be otherwise? Scientists cannot understand why life evolves. Life evolves only because existence is only fun and meaningful if it moves toward this complete understanding of unity and purpose. All of life evolves—except the operating system of existence and life that manages each part of this process, this upward climb. It is the destiny of that which is created to sophisticate and advance to realize its own level of highest experience, fulfillment and entertainment is itself to explore and imitate creation. Economics is the entirety of human movement toward this open end. That which is created is destined to create. It is the only process of never-ending surprise and ecstasy. We are pre-fixed to this set-point. To pare away problems is to discover this core. The guts of this moral and physiological mechanism cannot evolve or change because it is already permanently perfect. Any injustice we ever rationally perceive is an interference to this process. Anything we fear is in the end an interference to this most rewarding, safe and entertaining process. The fruit of every result, activity or thought leads to this strangely perfect efficiency of reduced risk and self-reward that only fits this perpetual futurity. Not only is the template innate, but the
sensory framework to recognize this lone beacon of the perfect life is also innate, and indestructible because it is already likewise permanently flawless. I know instinctively that I am not to be held from this process.
Strangest and most telling of all, this operating system underlying everything is so seamless that we lack even the ability to imagine a better system, or a better way to spend our lives. You and I (within the same tribe) agree on a fair price to raise one
another’s quality of life. This is why Karl Marx tried three times and failed to describe a Utopia beyond our current course and eventually threw Marxism away. We may argue with our course—but the end result cannot be outdone. Just as with our health, there are only two types of complaint to take against this OS as it makes us function now: One type is “I wish I could jump over the moon,” and the other is, “I wish I could hurt myself or others and get all I want, and live a thousand years.” Whether you are aware of hurting yourself or not, the healthy, holistic reward, motivation and value of everything is ultimately set by the operating system, and the overarching value of the journey, of the process, over anything less. You like what you see and value today—wait till what you see and value tomorrow! Our survival, tribal security, efficiency and movement forward all depend only on our level of interest to do it. Why do we care if we are here or not? Why do we care if we are seeing and witnessing or not? What is there to see? Something wants us here. Therefore we will fight not to be killed or cheated. Then, what we value most, and find most interesting, is genius in anything. Those who do this best are rewarded most. The only two criticisms of the operating system regret our limitations of matter. However, our limitations of matter are our guides to our epiphany. Suffering leads to answers. Stress and benefit are ultimately only defined by congruence or incongruence with the ideal. This makes existence linear and predictable except for accident and genius. We only suffer now because we (or some of us) do not yet know how to live and think in order to coax the best from one another. Science and history prove nothing but this through the law of stress and benefit as we circle down the drain of our own psychological and physiological responses that are wired around how we must holistically respect the genius machine and the potential of us all to help. By this model, all of us matter—since, at our best, in the genius machine, we are all either geniuses or helpers of genius. Neither can be their best without the other since it is inefficient to run a genius machine if everyone is a genius and there are no helpers to help with some ventures into genius that require a great deal of help. And there must be payment, since there are replacement costs, and appreciation, homage, interest. Without any of this genius slows, genius stops. —Why bother with the risks and costs? Reward guides and encourages genius. Otherwise there is no fun, no interest, no reward.
Article 5:
Antagonists and Agonists, Good versus Evil, the Normalcy in the Ideal versus the Abnormalcy in Psychopathy
Understanding evil, strife, pain, perfect irrationality and ruthless psychopathy is much easier and forgivable when we think of the roles of agonists and antagonists. How long does it take one hand to wash itself without the antagonist of the other hand or wiping the hand on something? Only the antagonist makes the feat possible. If the ideal shows perfect holism and rationalism then it takes little imagination to see that the perfect
antagonist must have all of the potential to match the ideal with perfect irrationality, ruthless inhumanity, and a murderous disregard of facts, consequences, humanity, decency and even the perfect offer of the most holistic life for all of us. This might even be more the case if the ideal is so perfect as to test the credulity of the audience, in which case the perfect antagonist becomes absolutely necessary. The antagonist is, wittingly or unwittingly, the perfect enzyme, accelerant, agitant, catalyst, stress and irritant to push us toward realization even in the face of our disbelief that anything not of our own human making could truly be perfect. The unyielding pain from a perfect foe that is completely controllable through our own choice is the only effective spur to jar us awake out of mediocrity.
Our three biggest problems then are that
1) we don’t realize the holistic perfection in our being a genius machine, and
2) we don’t know the basics of health that make thriving linear and predictable in order to pursue and enjoy our genius to the fullest, and
3)we do not yet realize that our only real enemy is not people but psychopathy and its closed mind and the considerably addictive power appropriate to the role of the antagonist. The one syndrome in the world where we lose any care for the facts and consequences to ourselves and others is addiction of any kind. Only the addict will kill itself (and others) and pay no attention to the facts on the way down. Therefore it must follow that nothing addicts like psychopathy or that addiction is a perfect progressive embodiment of psychopathy. The more one is addicted the less they care. The less they care about how existence offers the precise recipe for thriving, fulfillment and the highest level of interest for all—guaranteed by the simplest recipe of self-improving practices and realizations. And misery loves company. Addicts want more addicts for strength in numbers and cooperation over conflict. They don’t care about the holistic perfect that tunes the human instrument. They don’t care that the more we disturb the pure running of the machine the more we create stress that kills us, rots us, from inside out, down where no drug or surgery can do anything more than scoop out the rot to give us a little time against the inevitable, awful, terminal disease of living and thinking wrongly. The rot is the inevitable reward for the violation. Look at how we changed our entire life experience and stress quotient in the 19th century when we realized that our symbiosis with germs was thrown off by filth in our lives, in our bodies, our cities and food. Hygiene and better food alone ridded us of nearly 100% of the deadliness of the disease killers of the ancient world, not vaccines. As if an invisible parent was waiting for us to learn how we were better off without snot on our faces—we completely changed our level of stress and well-being. Despite ourselves, we learned we were far better off if we stuck to the self-improvement written into a previously invisible ideal that had been in place seemingly forever. Wipe the snot off your face, don’t eat crap— and watch how you will completely change your life experience.
Similar to cleanliness, research shows there are five more similar “ideals” or hygienes that would probably show the same revolutionary uplift in our understanding and well-being—our ability and willingness to serve creation. This is interesting because human lifespan is now known to be 150 years. Are we only living half our lifespan because invisible stresses are killing us, and we as yet know no real benefits to truly counteract stress? Stress opens the door to germ imbalance by reducing immunity. However much we deviate from the ideal makes us “dead,” and germs simply recycle us. It is just that ruthless and efficient. Like stress, facts and psychopathy, germs are unavoidably here to guide us in how to live our best. Without them we could not learn.
Article 6:
Five Ideals or Hygienes that Defy Hesiod’s ‘Everything in Moderation’ Page
The five (or six?) ideals are the “perfect” ways to 1) eat, 2) exercise mind and body, 3) structure our body like a musical instrument, especially the spine, 4) to think and relate to others in our tribe, and 5) align our tribe with others. Should “cleanliness” be considered one of the absolute ideals when a little dirt is good for us, and germs are inescapable? . . . These five or six “hygienes” would seem to cover all bases to optimize our thriving and the Genius MachineTM and make our best life linear and predictable. Only these five ideals contradict Hesiod’s ancient axiom of “all things in moderation,” and deliver especial weight in prevention, healing and longevity. The five basics are: 1) a plant-based diet where we are always safe raising the percentage of vegetables, fruits and antioxidants in our diet. 2) Placing our body and mind in meditation, mindfulness and prayer at the center of our lives with an exercise program that we see in research on Tai Chi, and less so in Yoga or meditation. 3) Fully realizing and implementing the century’s worth of findings in chiropractic, and even more so in the innovations of chiropractic biophysics (CBP) to precisely analyze and correct deviations from perfect posture/structural tuning, and actually correct them. 4) Our function in our society— how well we reduce our animal instincts to raise one another’s quality of life in our tribe or society. 5) First, within our own tribe, then later, with all tribes.
History, science and the humanities would seem to show that however much our thoughts and actions clash with the superrational ideal sets off the stress cascade. The stress cascade makes our body “grow wrong” and rot from inside out. The only real cure is the return to the ideal. This remarkable ideal is even made better and more liberal, and dare we use the word “loving”?, because of hormetic effect. Hormetic effect appears to be a universal psychosocialbiological property, where if we miss the ideal by some degree, cellular adaptations improve us to a considerable extent. Therefore, we are not fragile, but the fact that at present we have NO idea what the ideal is, and NO insight into what the small collection of true benefits and cures are—we get in trouble and rot half our lives away in mediocrity from accelerated stress and aging.
If this is a credible description of a human ideal, then the function and organization of the unit becomes circular, spherical and impregnable from any force of deformity in scale with itself. Only when forces, influences (stresses) are so sharp or prolonged as to be out of scale with the organizational integrity of the unit do they harm. We appear to have no power to change these innate expectations (because they are perfect) nor does anyone who is sane appear to expect or want to change them. This simple model, with thriving-genius at its center, appears also to be the universal definition for sanity and insanity, rationality irrationality, productive nonproductive.
Article 7:
A New Description of the Stress Cascade and How Deviation from Sigma Ruins Our Lives, Elevates Risk and Stress, and Kills Us
Walter B. Canon, Hans Selye, Watmore and Kohi and many others have well-outlined how stress overwhelms human limitations of matter to create stress, alert response, fatigue, exhaustion, faster aging, dysfunction, mental disorders, addiction, disease and death. Chiropractors have insisted that they have observed, and worked highly successfully with, what is probably another consistent part of the stress cascade. This is the part of damaged or deformed structure. Probably, the ideal physical structure of any biological system or organism is warped by stress in exact accord with the size of the stress. This might follow because balance is a structural force of the universe. This might follow since nothing is what it is without its structure, its chemistry, psyche, function and how it keeps playing its role in the evolution to push everything toward the one great realization. It probably follows that all of these five categories of being are proportionately damaged by any stress due to the laws on the conservation of energy and matter, and probably a law on the conservation of perfect function. Chiropractors and other adherents of structural biology are probably right in insisting that one of these key systems is this structural one. The research supports their insistence wholeheartedly. Put together, once the camel’s back is broken by any combination of stresses, the stress cascade would physically warp the structure of any biological system or organism. This 3D distortion could potentially show up in any other silo of function, including psychological. This would mean that any “healthcare system” or society that failed to grasp how the two-way street between stress and benefit is ultimately only fixed to the ideal could spend all the money in the world for medical care and vaccines and not stop the rot coming from inside out. This would mean that a preternatural insistence would block any person from reaching their full quotient of thriving and positive life experience if they were not a “good” person, judging by the holistic standard implicit in creation and genius being the focal point of existence.
Thus the silo of psychology—knowing and accepting the true meaning of life—would be as essential for linear and predictable stress relief, prevention, benefit, fun, happiness and interest as right diet, exercise, tuning, function and interaction.
Making sense of our world is just not possible without understanding stress as the cause of all problems, and grasping how the crushing or warping of structural tuning is an inevitable part of the stress cascade. The power of chiropractic alone to heal, just as in the case of proper nutrition and exercise, ripped big holes in the Pharma ideal business model, so that medicine and Pharma worked decisively to hide chiropractic. Pharma argues that all our health solutions are chemical in nature. But while it is true that everything is made of chemicals it is not true that chemistry solves all problems.
Death by falling is a structural problem. Death by poor nutrition or toxicity is a chemical problem. Death by PTSD is from the shock of seeing so much that clashes with the humane superrationality of the ideal, even if the victim does not know exactly what the ideal is. We all possess an innate understanding of how life should be. This is why the ideal cannot be argued against. But for a real cure to happen, all deviations from the ideal must be walked back as close to the ideal as we can get them. Structure is probably the last straw that breaks the camel’s back because it is the most permanent. The faster aging part of stress makes the joint age two to three times faster than normal. Autopsy research by Winsor finds that the cause of death is always downstream from this break. The bent joint probably represents a comprehensive snarl across the entire spectrum of the individual at that locality that doubtless makes the entire person that much less. It is probably the best red flag indicating a whole scramble of local normal function that will then age up to three times faster than our other less-affected parts. Yet we are the children of medicine and Pharma. We still think thriving is mostly only a chemical question of pure food and less toxicity. It is not. What about structure? What about psyche? What about the function of what you do with your life? What about the risk and stress of war and ideology when we clash with other tribes? Thriving is a whole question of keeping ourselves right to best serve the peerless event of the most fair, wonderful, interesting thing we can healthfully do. Chiropractic in addition looks like the only solution for much of our political conflicts. The Left and the Right are basically divided over social welfare and eldercare. The Left wants more spending that keeps growing because Pharma offers no real cures. The Right argues that open-ended pointless spending detracts from the genius machine. Both sides are right, but we lack the holistic rationale. The biggest cost for all national healthcare systems is HRPs, High Resource Patients. HRPs, in all nations, is not cancer, heart disease or diabetes, but dysfunction and pain from degenerative arthritis that comes from structural distortions that begin almost completely in the spine and feet. Missing the chiropractic piece means that any combination of other fixes will never wholly work. The stress cascade is like a monstrous hand twisting and ruining every wire in the junction box, starting with the nervous system, the Master System. Stress warps everything in proportion to the stress. Ignoring or denying the structural piece dooms us to never reach a holistic model.
The Operating System is Perfect Except for all the Suffering We Endure In Order to Learn the Perfect System
The symmetry and humane fairness of the operating system is exquisite except for this brutal unfairness. All the poor people who have suffered because of ignorance or
psychopathy during the million years while the human machine worked up to realize its perfect mission. But maybe even this glaring, nightmarish unfairness gives us insight into the larger mechanism of exquisite perfection otherwise at work in every other sphere and phase of existence and life except this one. Let’s consider the “in for a penny, in for a pound” argument on the circle of the universe.
There are only two possible scenarios at this point for arguing that life and existence make a perfect offer, and how the path to realization is opened only by the simple choice to do no holistic harm. The possibilities are that the offer of existence is not perfect, or that it is perfect except for the awful suffering of billions savaged by ignorance and psychopathy whenever we damage ourselves and impede the machine. It is impossible to argue that the operating system is perfect if there is no afterlife of some kind where the awful crimes done to us by the psychopathic antagonist make no difference in the long run. Phase One existence is where we are now with tribalism and dog eat dog and kill or be killed thinking, and psychopathy ruining commerce and enterprise, statecraft, truth, humanism and everything else. Phase Two would be when we become civilized enough to see ourselves enough as one tribe that we do no holistic harm to one another that would disturb the genius machine. Look at all the cruelty in history resulting from our passage through Phase One. Without this afterlife of Phase Three there is no way to argue that the operating system and its offer of the best possible life is superrationally perfect.
I would argue that the few glimpses we have from people who have come back from a look at death support the argument that any suffering we do on this side is made up for on the other side, so that the inarguable unfairness and brutality of whatever happens here during Phase One is compensated for after death in a Phase Three. Otherwise a system that is inarguably perfect in every other respect is glaringly awful and unfair in this one element. This makes no sense because the model is not symmetrical. Symmetry exists everywhere else—how can it fall short only here?
In conclusion, we may feel reluctant to accept a functional, processual, experiential and existential center-point as the core of why we exist. Because that core feels ephemeral, it feels uncertain. But it is not. It is implacably fixed on our own highest humanity. Our universe is run by a maze of structural forces probably made out of consciousness—that is everywhere and nowhere at once, the substrate of everything and yet unlikely to ever fully know, feel or control. We can only “control” it by living and thinking correctly. Complexity science and other branches of science have already pointed out how all of reality is, as Heraclitus said, never placing our foot into the same river. As Zen says, all is impermanence. All, that is, except for the moral lesson behind everything and that reality sticks our face in. The great lesson that philosophers from Lao Tzu to Marx have missed is the positive role of materialism that both delights us and drives us into lessons on restraint that always end up at the tuning of the Genius MachineTM that loves and feeds on the mistakes, problems and errors of mortals. Every success rests on a mountain of mistakes. Which mistake can we remove from any pile that did not help find the solution? There seems to be a kind of semi-divine sweet spot for us in the biological determinism always at the top of thriving. If you want it, you must improve yourself, and earn it. God, Nature, Life, Existence, the Cosmos, the Universe, Creation or Godness made this functional, experiential “node” of bounded instability the core of the fortress of the universe, of entering into existence. One proof is that we are not able to even imagine an existence better than this one—and yet we still have dream on top— and anything less would spoil surprises and make learning and humane self-sacrifice mean less than everything. Another proof is that all tribes want to survive and improve their circumstances. In the end, genius is always the best way to do this. Another proof is that all cultures believe in the end that they have the best handle on how to help humankind. There is no explanation or method superior to this one that already makes our world go round.